Is Your Kid REALLY in the Top 5%?

How smart do you think you are?  If you are like most, probably 'way smarter than you really are. smartplanet.com says 40% of us think we're in the top 5% (in my city, the gifted child program was dropped because too many parents with kids in the top 25% insisted their kids be part of it). 

 The Web site quotes David Dunning, who says that, "not only are we terrible at seeing how stupid we are, but we're also too dumb to recognize genius right in front of us."

 Here's another stunning fact he's come across.  Incompetence can mask the awareness of one’s incompetence. The phenomenon is now called the Dunning-Kruger Effect, according to smartplanet.com. Dunning reportedly based this on a bank robber who squirted lemon juice all over his face and thought he was invisible because in a photo he took with a Polaroid, his image mysteriously disappeared.  But that story's for another day.

The bottom line:  he didn't even know what an idiot he was.  

Dunning discovered through research that we humans "are terrible at self-assessment, often grading ourselves as far more intelligent and capable than we actually are," smartplanet points out.

And as bad as we may be at assessing ourselves, we also don't see genius right in front of us.

I admit it does not come from me, but my son is pretty smart.  Straight A's and grasping mathematical concepts I couldn't even conceive of, in 7th grade.  But, at the same time, I also know that he's probably never going to be one of those kids who comes up with a cure for pancreatic cancer (like the 15-year-old from Maryland who didn't, really, but may have brought survival rates up 100% for this notoriously always quickly fatal cancer). 

At least I'm realistic.  But many aren't.  OK, OK, we all know our kids are the greatest, smartest things yet but a little common sense is in order, Dunning says.

"Whether it be an intellectual task, social task, any task, people’s beliefs about the quality of their work does not bear much relationship with reality, as far as we can measure it," smartplanet quotes Dunning.

Not surprisingly, it breaks down along gender lines.  Men think they're much smarter at scientific stuff than women, for example, who vastly underestimate their own skills at it.

There is some good news about top performers.  Apparently, they keep on performing, while poor performers do not.  (What genius thought of this?!)

It turns out that poor performers don't have the ability to see how poorly they're doing.  And they, and often the rest of us, don't see the mistakes we're making.  But the smart people do.

So what does this mean for humanity?  This surprised me.  Dunning says we need to look to other people to get accurate assessments of our performance.  (I better not look to my mother-in-law!)










Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Take Herbal Supplements? Even Green Tea Extract Can Lead to Liver Damage

Take herbal supplements? You might want to listen up. A new study is warning that new information is showing that some supplements may damage the liver, along with over the counter drugs and even those prescribed by physicians, according to newswise.com. The rate of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), a rare adverse drug reaction which is challenging to diagnose -- and which can lead to jaundice, liver failure and even death -- is increasing more and more.  Experts put it down to the overwhelming use of herbal supplements and other drugs in the last 10 years.  “A lot of consumers have a preconceived notion that if it’s a natural product, it must be safe. But that is not necessarily the case,” the Web site quotes Herbert Bonkovsky, MD, FACG, co-author of the guidelines. “Most of these products are not well-regulated and have very little oversight. Traces of heavy metals and prescription drugs have even been found in some herbal and dietary supplements. We encourage patients to
Read more

Social Media Replacing Human Contact? Nah

I used to think my son only talked to his "girlfriend" (did I mention he'll be 12 in June?) in school.  Then I happened to walk by his computer and saw her on his screen.  They Skype.  About three hours a day.  Then I got it.  It's real.  Kids mostly communicate electronically these days. But Joe McKendrick at smartplanet.com believes there are reasons social media won't completely replace face-to-face interactions.  For one, there's less distraction.  If you're sitting at your computer, you're scanning for emails or googling or watching the news, in addition to talking to someone.  When you're actually with someone, it's harder to do this -- though, Joe, are you living on Mars? Have you never seen a teen texting at the table, while talking to you, or God forbid, driving? Most of McKendrick's points have to do with the office, and meeting in person to do business rather than connecting online.  I have to admit here, it makes sense.  He
Read more

Be Humble. Your Employees May Work Harder

You wouldn't know it from our current crook- er - commander-in-chief but it pays to be humble , new research is showing. It’s good to be humble when you’re the boss – as long as that’s what your employees expect, according to newswise.com. Researchers studying workplaces in China found that some real-life teams showed more creativity if the employees rated their bosses as showing more humility. “Whether leader humility is a good thing really depends on the team members’ expectations,” says  Jia (Jasmine) Hu , lead author of the study and associate professor of  management and human resources  at The Ohio State University’s  Fisher College of Business . Humble leaders are most effective when team members expect a low degree of distance between the leaders and followers, Hu explains. When there is "low power distance" (I assume, this means when the boss is humble), employees share power with their boss in a collaborative way. But humility may be seen as a weaknes
Read more